| 1. What is the Minnesota Hospital Quality Report? |
|
The
“Minnesota Hospital Quality Report” is a web resource
(www.mnhospitalquality.org) for health care consumers about hospital quality of
care that launched in April 2006. This Web site is designed to support and
assist consumers, as well as providers, by making information available about
the quality and safety of care in Minnesota hospitals. This resource was
developed by the Minnesota Hospital Quality Partnership (a partnership with the
Minnesota Hospital Association and Stratis Health, Minnesota’s Quality
Improvement Organization), and a steering committee comprised of Minnesota
hospital representatives. The “Minnesota Hospital Quality Report” site is unique
in that it provides information specific to Minnesota hospitals, making it
easier for consumers and providers to access. Quality of care information
related to hospitals nationwide can be found on the federal “Hospital Compare”
Web site (www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov).
|
|
| 2. Why are we providing this resource? What is the value? |
|
Consumers, employers, health plans, and the government want greater access to
hospital performance information. The interest in greater transparency about
hospital quality will only grow. By voluntarily releasing quality of care
information, hospitals can ensure that the information that is released is
meaningful for both the public and the provider community, and that results are
interpreted as accurately as possible.
|
|
| 3. Why are hospitals reporting this information? |
|
Minnesota hospitals are committed to
sharing meaningful information for consumers regarding performance. MHA and Stratis Health
also support giving patients information that will help them make decisions
about their medical care. The reporting of this data also provides an incentive
for hospitals to continue to improve their use of these best practices.
|
|
| 4. How have hospitals been involved in this project? |
|
MHA and Stratis Health formed a
steering committee of hospital representatives including physicians, nurses, and
other patient safety and quality management experts. The steering committee’s
recommendations form the basis for this project.
|
|
| 5. Why aren’t all hospitals listed on the Web site? |
|
Almost
all hospitals are listed on the
site, based on their consent to allow Minnesota Hospital Association and Stratis Health to publish
this data. Many of the hospitals that are not listed are small rural hospitals
with fewer than 25 beds, which are called “Critical Access Hospitals.” Not all
of these small hospitals are yet gathering and reporting the initial measures
that we are using, based on the federal government’s existing efforts. Also,
hospitals that primarily serve children, psychiatric, or rehabilitation
patients, or serve a different population of patients than what our report
measures are not listed.
|
|
| 6. What are the measures that are included on the Minnesota Hospital Quality Report? |
|
The quality measures reported on the site are tied to four conditions:
heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia and surgical care. These are two types
of measures on this site — an Appropriate Care Measure
and "quality of care" measures. Many of the
practices being measured are hard for someone who isn’t a physician or nurse to
understand. What’s important is that these are practices that are well accepted
nationally as steps that should be taken in the care of the conditions.
About one million people per year suffer a heart attack, also known as acute
myocardial infarction. Heart attacks are among the leading causes of hospital
admission for patients 65 and older. The following steps are considered best
practices for the treatment of heart attacks. These “quality of care” measures
are included on the Web site. They include:
-
Aspirin at arrival
-
Aspirin at discharge
-
Angiotensin-converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor
Blockers and (ARBs) for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)
-
Beta Blocker at arrival
-
Beta Blocker at discharge
-
Thrombolytic agent received within 30 minutes of hospital arrival
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) received within 120 minutes of
hospital arrival
-
Smoking cessation advice/counseling
Heart failure is the most common hospital admission diagnosis in patients 65 or
older and accounts for more than 700,000 hospitalizations among Medicare
beneficiaries every year. The following measures on the Web site represent the
best practices for the treatment of heart failure:
-
Assessment of left ventricular function
-
ACE Inhibitor or ARB for left ventricular systolic dysfunction
-
Discharge instructions
-
Smoking cessation advice/counseling
Community-acquired pneumonia causes four million illnesses and nearly one
million hospital admissions each year.
Best practices include:
-
Oxygenation assessment
-
Initial antibiotic timing
-
Appropriate initial antibiotic selection
-
Blood culture performed prior to first antibiotic received in hospital
-
Pneumococcal vaccination
-
Smoking cessation advice/counseling
The following measures on the Web site represent the best practices for the
treatment of surgical care improvement/surgical infection prevention:
-
Received preventative antibiotic(s) one hour before incision
-
Preventative antibiotics(s) stopped within 24 hours after surgery
The newest information on the Minnesota Hospital Quality Report is patients’
ratings of their hospital care. The data comes from a national survey called
the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, or
HCAHPS.
The survey has 27 questions. Besides the demographic questions, the other
questions are combined into eight key areas, including:
-
Communication with doctors
-
Communication with nurses
-
Responsiveness of hospital staff
-
Pain control
-
Communication about medicines
-
Cleanliness of hospital environment
-
Quietness of hospital environment
The data will also include patients overall rating of the hospital and their
willingness to recommend the hospital to others.
|
|
| 7. Are these indicators equal to a "rating" of the hospital? |
|
Not necessarily. Small
differences in the percentages usually don’t show that one hospital is
significantly better or worse. Still, these measures have been shown to lead to
better outcomes. If a hospital fails to routinely perform the steps, a patient
has a right to question their provider. But this data should not be used as the
sole basis of making a decision about a hospital. It is intended to be of use as
one factor in your decision, not the final verdict.
|
|
| 8. Does the site help users make comparisons? |
|
The Web site is about
helping patients, families, and caregivers make more informed decisions about
the care that’s best for them. All participating hospitals will be listed on the
Web site, with detailed results for each reported measure.
|
|
| 9. Where can I view the data in spreadsheet form? |
To view
the Minnesota Hospital Quality Report data in spreadsheet form for research or
other purposes, click below.
Data Download
|
|
| 10. How recent is the data? What time period does the MHQR cover? |
|
The
information is as recent as possible, reflecting the same time period used with Hospital Compare. The
data is at least nine months old. The data is reported for a one-year period, with updates made quarterly, as hospitals submit new data.
|
|
| 11. How can consumers use this data? |
|
Consumers may want to review the available data when
considering a hospital visit for a scheduled procedure. The web resource is one
tool that can help consumers compare the quality of care in local Minnesota
hospitals and allow them to make informed decisions. Consumers should also
talk to family and friends, health care professionals, and contact
local consumer organizations for references.
|
|
| 12. How is it helpful? |
|
The information available on the
“Minnesota Hospital Quality Report” is helpful to hospitals and clinicians as
they continually work to improve the quality of the care they deliver. By
reporting on these areas and increasing public awareness of this information,
this report will reinforce the importance of working to address these measures.
|
|
| 13. Background |
|
Launched in early 2006, this site
will continue to grow richer with more resources and information. It is being
offered through the Minnesota Hospital Quality Partnership, formed by the
Minnesota Hospital Association and Stratis
Health, the Quality Improvement Organization for
Minnesota. We believe that Minnesotans benefit from improved access to meaningful information about hospital quality.
|
|
| 1. What is the Appropriate Care Measure? |
|
The Appropriate
Care Measure (ACM) is a patient-focused measure that provides a way of looking
at whether a patient received ALL of the “appropriate or right care”
(recommended treatments) that he or she should have received, based on his or
her clinical condition. Each patient is unique and may not be eligible for every
type of care for a condition. The ACM takes patient individuality into
consideration, looking at one patient and their episode of care at a time,
related to their specific condition.
|
|
| 2. What are the Quality of Care Measures? |
|
The quality
measures report on the site are "quality of care" measures that describe how
often certain practices of care have been followed. Unlike the Appropriate Care
Measure, the quality measures illustrate hospitals’ work on each measure by
combining all patients treated for a particular condition. The quality measures
broadly describe the care provided by a hospital.
|
|
| 3. How is the information collected? |
|
In
order to collect the necessary information for this project, hospitals must
extract data elements from patients’ medical charts, which is a rather costly
method. Fortunately, in order to minimize the collection burden, this project
takes advantage of information that is already being collected for other
purposes such as for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and state requirements.
|
|
| 4. Why don't all hospitals have data in all the measure sets? |
|
Hospitals
may phase-in reporting of measures over time as they begin to collect the
information. Hospitals must decide which measures apply to them, based on the
services that they provide. Not all measures are relevant for the patient
population of every hospital. For instance, some patients may enter one
hospital’s emergency department and require additional inpatient services at
another hospital. Also, the Web site does not include hospitals' statistics
about a measure if that hospital handles only a relatively small number of cases
involving that measure. For example, a hospital that treats only a few people
who have had heart attacks would not provide data on the number of times the
hospital had administered aspirin to such patients upon arrival at the hospital,
because that statistic would not provide a valid comparison with hospitals that
treat large numbers of heart-attack patients.
|
|
| 5. Can hospitals manipulate the data to boost their scores? |
|
There
are checks and balances to ensure the accuracy of the data. While the data are
self-reported, hospitals are subject to audits by the federal government to
validate their data.
|
|
| 1. Where does this information come from? |
|
The information comes from a national survey called the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, or HCAHPS. The survey measures a patient’s experience at a hospital. The survey doesn’t ask patients their level of happiness or satisfaction. Instead, the survey asks patients to identify the frequency by which important elements of care occurred.
|
|
| 2. What kind of information is in the survey? |
|
The newest information on the Minnesota Hospital Quality Report is patients’
ratings of their hospital care. The data comes from a national survey called
the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, or
HCAHPS.
The survey has 27 questions. Besides the demographic questions, the other
questions are combined into eight key areas, including:
-
Communication with doctors
-
Communication with nurses
-
Responsiveness of hospital staff
-
Pain control
-
Communication about medicines
-
Cleanliness of hospital environment
-
Quietness of hospital environment
The data will also include patients overall rating of the hospital and their
willingness to recommend the hospital to others.
|
|
| 3. How is the information collected? |
|
The information comes from the HCAHPS survey, which is administered 48 hours to six weeks after discharge to a random sample of adult patients across medical conditions. Participating hospitals may either use an approved survey vendor, or collect their own HCAHPS data (if approved by CMS to do so). To accommodate hospitals, HCAHPS can be implemented in four different survey modes: mail, telephone, mail with telephone follow-up, or active interactive voice recognition (IVR). Hospitals can either integrate the HCAHPS survey with their own patient satisfaction survey, or use HCAHPS by itself. Hospitals must survey patients throughout each month of the year.
|
|
| 4. How many hospitals in Minnesota are participating? |
|
Nationally, there are 2,700 hospitals (out of more than 5,000 total hospitals) participating in HCAHPS. In Minnesota, hospitals across the state—big and small facilities—are participating. And more facilities will be part of future additions of data to the site.
|
|
|